Summary
1
Mandatory on-costs add a tight 14% to 16%: employer NI (15% above £5,000) plus the 3% minimum pension.
2
Indirect costs add another 20% to 30%: recruitment, onboarding, equipment, overhead and management time.
3
Turnover is the hidden multiplier, an inflation-adjusted ~£42,000 per leaver, budgeted across the team.
4
The £30k example, fully loaded (with amortised turnover and full overhead) reaches the upper end, ~£47k.
5
The lever most cost-stressed SMEs are pulling: basing some roles in a lower-cost market, cutting per-role cost 40% to 60%.
01What is permanent establishment?
What is permanent establishment?
Permanent establishment is a concept from international tax law that determines when a business of one country becomes subject to corporate tax in another country. The concept exists to answer a specific question: at what point does a UK business's activity in (for example) South Africa become sufficient that South Africa is entitled to tax the profits arising from that activity, rather than leaving them entirely within UK tax jurisdiction?
The permanent establishment threshold sits in two places that work together. International treaty law (the OECD Model Tax Convention, Article 5) defines permanent establishment in detail and is implemented through individual bilateral treaties such as the 2002 UK-South Africa Double Tax Convention as amended by the 2010 Protocol. UK domestic law mirrors and supports the treaty position through section 1141 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010, which provides the domestic permanent establishment definition that the UK applies to foreign companies operating in the UK.
The OECD Article 5 framework is structured as follows:
The permanent establishment threshold sits in two places that work together. International treaty law (the OECD Model Tax Convention, Article 5) defines permanent establishment in detail and is implemented through individual bilateral treaties such as the 2002 UK-South Africa Double Tax Convention as amended by the 2010 Protocol. UK domestic law mirrors and supports the treaty position through section 1141 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010, which provides the domestic permanent establishment definition that the UK applies to foreign companies operating in the UK.
The OECD Article 5 framework is structured as follows:
01
Article 5(1)
sets out the general definition: a permanent establishment is "a fixed place of business through which the business of an enterprise is wholly or partly carried on".
02
Article 5(2)
lists typical examples that constitute a permanent establishment: a place of management, a branch, an office, a factory, a workshop, a mine, an oil or gas well, or any other place of extraction of natural resources.
03
Article 5(3)
provides for construction-site permanent establishment: a building site, construction or installation project constitutes a permanent establishment if it lasts longer than a defined threshold (12 months in most treaties, including UK-SA).
04
Article 5(3)(b) in the UK-SA DTC specifically
also creates a deemed permanent establishment where an individual performs professional services in the other state for more than 183 days in any 12-month period. The UK-SA treaty's narrower services-PE provision applies only to individuals, not to corporate service-providers, which is favourable to UK companies sending staff on shorter engagements
05
Article 5(4)
excludes from permanent establishment certain preparatory or auxiliary activities (storage facilities, display rooms, purchasing offices, information collection).
06
Article 5(4.1)
is the anti-fragmentation rule added by the Multilateral Instrument: connected activities split between related parties cannot use the preparatory-and-auxiliary exclusion to avoid permanent establishment if the combined activities would not qualify.
07
Article 5(5)
is the dependent-agent rule: a person acting on behalf of the enterprise in the other state and habitually concluding contracts in the enterprise's name (or playing the principal role leading to the conclusion of contracts) creates a permanent establishment for the enterprise.
08
Article 5(6)
is the independent-agent exception: an enterprise is not deemed to have a permanent establishment merely because it carries on business through a broker, general commission agent, or any other agent of independent status acting in the ordinary course of their business.
09
Article 5(7)
clarifies that a subsidiary relationship does not, by itself, create a permanent establishment: the mere fact that a company controls or is controlled by another company does not make either company a permanent establishment of the other.
02How permanent establishment actually gets triggered
How permanent establishment actually gets triggered
The Article 5 framework is comprehensive, but in practice, the great majority of permanent establishment situations for UK businesses arise from one of four triggers. Knowing which trigger applies to which kind of engagement is the difference between a confident commercial arrangement and an open exposure.
Trigger 1: Fixed place of business. This is the most common permanent establishment trigger and the easiest to identify. If a UK company rents office space in another country, sets up a branch, or maintains a workshop, factory, or other physical premises through which it carries on business, that location is a permanent establishment. The OECD Commentary on Article 5 emphasises three elements: the place must be fixed (located at a specific geographical point with a degree of permanence), it must be at the disposal of the enterprise (the enterprise has some right of use), and the business of the enterprise must be carried on through it. A coffee shop, a salesperson who works occasionally, does not meet the test; an office that the company pays for and uses regularly does.
For UK businesses hiring remote workers abroad, the question of whether a home office creates a fixed-place-of-business permanent establishment is the most-asked practical question. The OECD's current guidance (updated as part of the BEPS process and reflected in the 2017 and 2025 Commentary updates) is that an employee's home office can constitute a permanent establishment if the home is at the enterprise's disposal and used continuously for business activities of the enterprise. In practice, this is rare for typical knowledge-worker arrangements: the home is the worker's personal residence, the UK employer does not control or fund it, and the worker uses it because it is convenient. Both elements (disposal and continuous business use) need to be met, and the OECD specifically notes that a home office used because the worker prefers it (rather than because the employer requires it) does not generally meet the test.
Trigger 2: Dependent agent. A person acting on behalf of the UK enterprise in the other country, who has and habitually exercises authority to conclude contracts in the name of the enterprise, creates a dependent-agent permanent establishment under Article 5(5). The 2017 OECD revisions to Article 5(5) broadened this test to include agents who play the principal role, leading to the conclusion of contracts that are routinely concluded without material modification by the enterprise, which catches a wider range of sales and BD arrangements than the older test did.
The dependent-agent test is the most commercially relevant permanent establishment trigger for UK businesses considering international hires. A foreign-based salesperson, business development manager, or country lead who negotiates contracts on the UK company's behalf will often create a dependent-agent permanent establishment, regardless of whether they sign the final contract themselves. The risk is highest for revenue-generating commercial roles and lower for purely operational or technical roles.
Trigger 3: Services PE (where applicable). Some treaties contain a specific services-PE provision that creates a deemed permanent establishment once an enterprise spends more than a defined number of days providing services in the other state, regardless of whether there is a fixed place of business. The OECD Model does not contain such a provision in its main text (though it is in the optional Commentary). Many treaties between developed and developing countries do include it.
The UK-SA Double Tax Convention takes a narrower approach: under Article 5(3)(b), only the performance of professional services or other activities of an independent character by an individual, continuing in the other state for more than 183 days in any 12-month period, creates a deemed permanent establishment. The broader corporate services-PE concept that some treaties include does not apply, which is favourable to UK companies sending corporate teams on shorter engagements.
Trigger 4: Construction-site PE. Under Article 5(3) in most treaties, including UK-SA, a building site, construction or installation project constitutes a permanent establishment if it lasts longer than 12 months. This is relevant primarily for engineering, construction, and large-scale capital project businesses; less relevant for service-sector SMEs.
The BEPS and MLI changes. The OECD's Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Action 7 Final Report (2015) recommended tightening the permanent establishment rules to prevent the artificial avoidance of permanent establishment status. The recommendations were implemented through the Multilateral Instrument (MLI), which modifies existing bilateral treaties (including the UK-SA DTC) without requiring renegotiation. Four substantive changes affect permanent establishment analysis:
- The dependent-agent test is broadened to catch agents playing the principal role leading to contract conclusion, not just agents formally concluding contracts.
- The preparatory and auxiliary exclusions are narrowed, with each exclusion now requiring that the activity is itself preparatory or auxiliary, not just that it falls into a listed category.
- The anti-fragmentation rule (Article 5(4.1)) prevents related parties from splitting closely-connected activities to use the preparatory-and-auxiliary exclusion.
- The Principal Purpose Test (PPT) denies treaty benefits to arrangements where obtaining the benefit was one of the principal purposes, unless granting it would be in accordance with the object and purpose of the treaty.
03What happens if you create a permanent establishment
What happens if you create a permanent establishment
Crossing the permanent establishment threshold has concrete consequences. They are not catastrophic for most well-structured businesses, but they are expensive and operationally significant, which is why the practical question matters as much as the conceptual one.
Local corporation tax on attributable profits. Under Article 7 of the relevant double tax treaty, the host country has the right to tax the profits attributable to the permanent establishment. The attribution principle, set out in the OECD's Authorised OECD Approach (AOA) and adopted by most modern treaties, treats the permanent establishment as if it were a separate and independent enterprise dealing at arm's length with the head office and other related parties. For an SA permanent establishment of a UK company, that means SA corporation tax (currently 27% main rate) applies to the profits attributable to the SA operation. The UK then provides credit for the SA tax paid under Article 23 of the UK-SA DTC, but the cash and compliance costs have already landed.
Transfer pricing documentation. Once attribution applies, transfer pricing rules require both jurisdictions to be satisfied that the profits attributed to the permanent establishment reflect arm's length pricing for the activities, assets, and risks it bears. UK domestic transfer pricing sits in Part 4 of the Taxation (International and Other Provisions) Act 2010. The SA equivalent sits in section 31 of the Income Tax Act. For material permanent establishments, formal transfer pricing documentation is typically required.
Branch tax under the UK-SA DTC. Article 23(6) of the UK-SA DTC permits SA to impose an additional 5% branch tax on profits attributable to a permanent establishment in SA of a UK company, beyond the standard corporation tax. This is a deterrent against using a permanent establishment rather than a subsidiary structure, and it is one of the specific reasons UK businesses with a planned ongoing SA presence usually move from a permanent establishment position to a subsidiary as their scale grows.
Payroll, statutory contributions, and local registrations. A permanent establishment typically triggers obligations to register with the local tax authority, run local payroll for any staff working through it, pay employer-side statutory contributions (PAYE, UIF, SDL, COIDA in SA), and comply with local statutory filings. The administrative cost is real and often catches UK businesses by surprise.
Loss of treaty protections in some cases. Where the Principal Purpose Test applies under the MLI, treaty benefits may be denied entirely for arrangements with a tax-driven main purpose. This is mainly a concern for aggressive planning structures rather than commercial hiring decisions, but it sits in the background of any arrangement that has the practical effect of reducing tax.
Reputational and operational cost. A permanent establishment assessment from a foreign tax authority typically requires an audit response, restructuring of the arrangement, possible back-tax assessments and penalties, and a continuing relationship with the foreign tax authority going forward. The reputational cost in the local market and with future hires can be significant.
The combined effect is that creating a permanent establishment inadvertently (rather than as a deliberate commercial choice through a subsidiary) is expensive in cash, time, and management attention. The risk is worth taking seriously, even though for most well-structured EOR arrangements it does not arise.
Salary Benchmarking Tool
Select role and country to explore salary insights.
04How double tax treaties protect UK businesses
How double tax treaties protect UK businesses
The permanent establishment framework would be a far more difficult tax landscape for UK businesses without the protection of double tax treaties. The treaties exist to prevent the same income from being taxed twice (once by the country where it is earned and once by the country of residence of the earning entity), and to allocate taxing rights between the two countries on a predictable basis.
The UK has one of the largest treaty networks in the world, with comprehensive double tax conventions in force with most major trading partners. The treaty position for any UK business with operations or hires in another country is the starting point for the tax analysis: the treaty defines permanent establishment, allocates taxing rights, sets withholding tax rates on cross-border flows, and provides the mechanism for the relief of double taxation. The UK side of the analysis is consolidated in the HMRC International Manual, which is the authoritative interpretive guide for UK tax officials and practitioners.
The UK has one of the largest treaty networks in the world, with comprehensive double tax conventions in force with most major trading partners. The treaty position for any UK business with operations or hires in another country is the starting point for the tax analysis: the treaty defines permanent establishment, allocates taxing rights, sets withholding tax rates on cross-border flows, and provides the mechanism for the relief of double taxation. The UK side of the analysis is consolidated in the HMRC International Manual, which is the authoritative interpretive guide for UK tax officials and practitioners.
For UK businesses considering South Africa specifically, the relevant treaty is the 2002 UK-South Africa Double Tax Convention, as amended by the 2010 Protocol and modified by the MLI. Four articles do the heavy lifting:
- Article 5 (Permanent Establishment) defines when a UK enterprise has a taxable presence in SA, as discussed in Sections 1 and 2 above.
- Article 7 (Business Profits) allocates taxing rights on business profits: SA can tax a UK enterprise's business profits only to the extent attributable to a permanent establishment in SA. Without a permanent establishment, the SA's right to tax those profits is zero.
- Article 14 (Income from Employment) allocates taxing rights on employment income: the worker's employment income is taxed where the work is exercised, with limited exceptions for short-term cross-border arrangements (the 183-day rule).
- Articles 10, 11, and 12 (Dividends, Interest, Royalties) cap the withholding tax that one country can charge on cross-border flows of these passive income streams to a beneficial owner resident in the other country. The UK-SA position is favourable: dividends 5% (for 10%+ corporate shareholders), 15% (for REITs), or 10% (in other cases); interest and royalties are 0% (residence-state taxation only).
05 Permanent establishment risk by hiring route
Permanent establishment risk by hiring route
The most operationally useful way to think about permanent establishment risk is to compare the position under each of the three main hiring routes a UK business has when employing someone abroad. The risk profile is genuinely different in each case, and the difference is the starting point for an informed choice of hiring model.
A note on PEO. UK businesses sometimes encounter the term Professional Employer Organisation (PEO) in this context. PEO is a US-specific employment arrangement where the PEO and the client become co-employers of the worker; it is regulated under US-specific frameworks (NAPEO, ESAC, IRS CPEO programme under IRC s.7705). For UK businesses hiring outside the US, the relevant model is EOR, not PEO. Our comparison guide, EOR vs PEO, sets out the distinction in full.
06The South Africa case specifically
The South Africa case specifically
South Africa is the most-discussed destination market for UK businesses considering international hiring through an EOR, and for substantive reasons that connect directly to the permanent establishment analysis.
The skilled English-speaking workforce is large, particularly in Cape Town and Johannesburg, in roles spanning software engineering, finance, marketing, customer support, BD, and operations. The time-zone overlap with the UK is significant (one to two hours' difference depending on time of year, which means a full overlapping working day rather than the asynchronous handoff of US or Asian arrangements. The cost gap is meaningful (typical SA salaries are 40% to 60% below UK-equivalent on a like-for-like basis, before factoring in employer NI and pension reliefs available in the UK). And the structural tax position under the UK-SA Double Tax Convention is favourable: as discussed in Section 4, the treaty caps withholding rates, allocates taxing rights cleanly, and protects against double taxation through Article 23.
The practical EOR-based arrangement in SA looks like this. A UK business identifies a role suitable for SA hiring, uses a salary benchmarking tool to model the cost, engages a SA-based EOR (typically £400 to £600 per employee per month for full-service EOR), runs the recruitment process, signs an employment contract through the EOR, and onboards the worker. The worker is legally employed by the EOR in SA, taxable on SA employment under Article 14 of the UK-SA DTC, with SA PAYE handled by the EOR. The UK company has no fixed place of business in SA and no dependent agent there, so no permanent establishment is created under Article 5. The UK company continues to pay UK corporation tax at 25% on its worldwide profits as normal, and the EOR invoice is a deductible business expense for UK CT purposes.
The skilled English-speaking workforce is large, particularly in Cape Town and Johannesburg, in roles spanning software engineering, finance, marketing, customer support, BD, and operations. The time-zone overlap with the UK is significant (one to two hours' difference depending on time of year, which means a full overlapping working day rather than the asynchronous handoff of US or Asian arrangements. The cost gap is meaningful (typical SA salaries are 40% to 60% below UK-equivalent on a like-for-like basis, before factoring in employer NI and pension reliefs available in the UK). And the structural tax position under the UK-SA Double Tax Convention is favourable: as discussed in Section 4, the treaty caps withholding rates, allocates taxing rights cleanly, and protects against double taxation through Article 23.
The practical EOR-based arrangement in SA looks like this. A UK business identifies a role suitable for SA hiring, uses a salary benchmarking tool to model the cost, engages a SA-based EOR (typically £400 to £600 per employee per month for full-service EOR), runs the recruitment process, signs an employment contract through the EOR, and onboards the worker. The worker is legally employed by the EOR in SA, taxable on SA employment under Article 14 of the UK-SA DTC, with SA PAYE handled by the EOR. The UK company has no fixed place of business in SA and no dependent agent there, so no permanent establishment is created under Article 5. The UK company continues to pay UK corporation tax at 25% on its worldwide profits as normal, and the EOR invoice is a deductible business expense for UK CT purposes.
Our dedicated guide, Employer of Record South Africa, walks through the SA-specific mechanics in detail, including the Basic Conditions of Employment Act, the post-Van Wyk shared parental leave regime, the BCEA earnings threshold (R269,600.90 per year from 1 May 2026), B-BBEE considerations, and the practical onboarding process.
07How to hire compliantly without creating a permanent establishment
How to hire compliantly without creating a permanent establishment
For UK businesses ready to act on the cost case for international hiring, a clear three-step playbook avoids the permanent establishment pitfalls and lands the arrangement cleanly.
01
Choose the right hiring route for the role.
Apply the test from Section 5. For genuinely independent, time-limited, project-based engagements, the contractor route is appropriate. For ongoing, integrated, near-full-time roles, the EOR route is the standard answer. For scale (15 to 25+ employees in the country), the subsidiary route becomes worth considering, though most UK SMEs start with EOR and transition only once scale justifies the overhead.
02
Structure the engagement to avoid permanent establishment triggers
If the EOR route is chosen, the structure is largely handled by the arrangement: the EOR is the legal employer, the UK company has no premises, and permanent establishment is structurally avoided. The remaining attention point is for commercial roles (sales, BD, country manager) where the worker may have apparent or actual authority to negotiate or conclude contracts. Best practice is to centralise contracting authority in the UK head office, with the SA-based worker generating leads, supporting the relationship, and feeding the deal to UK signatories rather than negotiating to closure independently. This keeps the dependent-agent test on the right side of the threshold for the broader post-BEPS interpretation.
03
Document the arrangement properly
A clear service agreement between the UK company and the EOR, a clear employment contract between the EOR and the worker, a documented division of responsibilities between the UK company (direction and management) and the EOR (legal employer, payroll, compliance), and clear records of where contractual authority sits, all support the arrangement against any future tax-authority scrutiny.
08When permanent establishment actually applies (and when to worry)
When permanent establishment actually applies (and when to worry)
One of the most useful single things a guide on permanent establishment can do is calibrate the reader's actual risk position, because the level of concern that is warranted varies significantly by arrangement.
For a UK business weighing international hiring or expansion, five questions usually surface most of the exposure:
- Does anyone you engage abroad have the authority to negotiate or conclude contracts on your behalf? If yes, dependent-agent PE under Article 5(5) is in play, particularly under the post-2017 "principal role" test. The arrangement most at risk is engaging the person directly (as employee or contractor); an EOR substantially mitigates this by interposing a third-party legal employer.
- Do you have premises in another country that are "at the disposal" of your business? If yes (rented office, leased warehouse, dedicated workspace you pay for), fixed-place PE under Article 5(1) is possible. A home office of an EOR-employed worker is typically not enough; a paid-for, controlled workspace usually is.
- Are your activities in the country preparatory or auxiliary, or are they part of your core business? The Article 5(4) exclusions cover storage, display, delivery, information collection, and similar back-office functions. Sales, contracting, manufacturing, and commercial activity do not qualify.
- Could your activities be split across related entities to artificially stay below the PE threshold? If yes, the anti-fragmentation rule (Article 5(4.1)) is likely to combine them for the analysis. This is rarely relevant for SMEs but worth knowing about.
- Are you operating in a treaty country, and does the relevant treaty contain a services-PE provision? Most UK treaties (including UK-South Africa) do not, which is favourable to UK businesses; some treaties do, in which case mere duration of work in the country can, on its own, create PE.
Free PDF download
PE Risk Self-Assessment Checklist PDF
A fill-in worksheet to total the full cost stack for any role, line by line, and turn a salary figure into a budget you can plan against.
Download Checklist
09What HMRC and your UK accountant will care about
What HMRC and your UK accountant will care about
Permanent establishment analysis is not just a foreign jurisdiction question. UK tax law applies to UK companies regardless of where their activities take place, and several UK-specific rules interact with the permanent establishment position abroad. UK accountants and tax advisers will typically focus on four areas.
01
Transfer pricing
Under Part 4 of the Taxation (International and Other Provisions) Act 2010, transactions between a UK company and any related party (including a foreign subsidiary or a foreign branch/permanent establishment) must be at arm's length for UK tax purposes. The corresponding rule on the SA side sits in section 31 of the Income Tax Act. Transfer pricing documentation is required for material related-party transactions; for SME-scale arrangements, the documentation requirement is lighter, but the arm's-length principle still applies.
02
Controlled Foreign Company (CFC) rules
UK CFC rules can attribute certain profits of overseas subsidiaries back to the UK parent for UK corporation tax purposes. The rules are complex and have multiple exemptions (the exempt period exemption, the low-profits exemption, the territorial business profits exemption), and most active trading subsidiaries will pass at least one exemption. For SME-scale SA subsidiaries running genuine commercial operations, CFC rarely bites in practice, but the analysis needs to be done. The detailed UK position is set out in the HMRC International Manua
03
Diverted Profits Tax (DPT)
The DPT, introduced in 2015 and amended subsequently, applies at a 31% rate (per Finance Act 2021 section 8) to profits considered to be artificially diverted from the UK. It targets two scenarios: arrangements that avoid creating a UK taxable presence for what would otherwise be UK trading activity, and arrangements that involve transactions lacking economic substance. The DPT has been the subject of reform discussion in the Finance Bill 2025-26 (with proposed alignment with the broader CT regime), but the underlying intent remains. HMRC's interpretive guidance is in INTM489560. For SME-scale EOR arrangements with obvious commercial substance, DPT is not a practical concern; for more aggressive planning structures, it is.
04
Multinational Top-up Tax (Pillar Two)
The UK has implemented the OECD's Pillar Two GloBE rules through the Multinational Top-up Tax in Part 3 of the Finance (No.2) Act 2023. The rules apply to large multinational groups with consolidated revenue above €750 million and ensure a 15% minimum effective tax rate on profits in each jurisdiction.
Your UK accountants will care about all of the above, and the cost of UK-side compliance on an SA-related arrangement typically adds £3,000 to £10,000 per year to your UK accounting bill, depending on materiality and the structure (subsidiary vs EOR vs contractor). The EOR route generally adds the least UK-side compliance cost because there is no foreign legal entity to consolidate or analyse for CFC; the subsidiary route adds the most.
10The strategic conclusion
The strategic conclusion
For the typical UK SME that has worked through the permanent establishment analysis to this point, the strategic conclusion lands cleanly. The risk is real but manageable; the management depends on which hiring route is chosen, and for most UK SMEs hiring in South Africa, the EOR route delivers both the cost saving and the structural permanent establishment protection in a single arrangement.
The cost case alone is meaningful: typical SA salaries are 40% to 60% below UK-equivalent on a like-for-like basis, before factoring in the additional saving from avoided UK employer NI (15% above £5,000), avoided minimum pension contributions, and avoided UK recruitment overhead. The permanent establishment case adds the structural assurance that the cost saving does not come with a hidden compliance exposure. The combined effect is that for ongoing, integrated, near-full-time roles that can be performed remotely (which is most knowledge work in 2026), the EOR route in SA is consistently the cleanest answer on cost, time, risk, and operational complexity.
The cost case alone is meaningful: typical SA salaries are 40% to 60% below UK-equivalent on a like-for-like basis, before factoring in the additional saving from avoided UK employer NI (15% above £5,000), avoided minimum pension contributions, and avoided UK recruitment overhead. The permanent establishment case adds the structural assurance that the cost saving does not come with a hidden compliance exposure. The combined effect is that for ongoing, integrated, near-full-time roles that can be performed remotely (which is most knowledge work in 2026), the EOR route in SA is consistently the cleanest answer on cost, time, risk, and operational complexity.
Two Legends EOR clients show what Option 3 looks like in practice.
63%
like-for-like saving
Funding Bay
a London business finance brokerage, found that hiring in UK financial services was both expensive and hard to scale. Working with Legends EOR, the business built specialised marketing and business development teams in Cape Town, employed compliantly through an EOR with on-site office space and IT support. The result: an average like-for-like cost saving of 63%, and a tripling of UK turnover over two years on a substantially reduced cost base. The permanent establishment position was confirmed clean throughout; the EOR structure handled the SA-side compliance; the UK-side analysis was straightforward.
47%
like-for-like saving
Reduce the headcount cost base
a UK medical recruitment agency in Birmingham, took a similar route for its back-office functions. The agency built a team of six in South Africa through Legends EOR, employed compliantly under SA law with no UK entity to maintain, and achieved an average like-for-like cost saving of 47% while preserving full compliance and stable retention. Same structural pattern: EOR-based arrangement, permanent-establishment-clean by design, cost-saving banked.
To run the cost comparison for your own roles, the Legends EOR Salary Benchmarking Tool shows current SA salaries in pounds sterling for specific roles, with the EOR fee included. To talk through the permanent establishment analysis or the practical mechanics of an EOR arrangement for your business, get in touch with the Legends EOR team.
Free PDF download
The True Cost of a UK Hire Worksheet
A fill-in worksheet to total the full cost stack for any role, line by line, and turn a salary figure into a budget you can plan against.
Download worksheet
